Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Why We Should Go Into Space :Stephen Hawking

Why should we go into space? What is the justification for spending all that effort and money on getting a few lumps of Moon rock? Aren’t there better causes here on Earth?

In a way, the situation is like that in Europe before 1492. People might well have argued that it was a waste of money to send Columbus on a wild goose chase. Yet the discovery of the New World made a profound difference to the old. If nothing else, we wouldn’t have had a Big Mac or KFC.

Spreading out into space will have an even greater effect. It will completely change the future of the human race and maybe determine whether we have any future at all. It won’t solve any of our immediate problems on planet Earth, but it will give us a new perspective on them, and cause us to look outwards rather than inwards. Hopefully it would unite us to face a common challenge.

This would be a long-term strategy, and by long-term I mean hundreds or thousands of years. We could have a base on the Moon within 30 years, reach Mars in 50 years, and explore the moons of the outer planets in 200 years. By “reach” I mean with manned, or should I say “personed,” space flight. We have already driven rovers on Mars and landed a probe on Titan, a moon of Saturn, but if one is considering the future of the human race we have to go there ourselves.


                 


Going into space won’t be cheap, but it would take only a small proportion of world resources. NASA’s budget has remained roughly constant in real terms since the time of the Apollo landings, but it has decreased from 0.3% of US GDP in 1970 to 0.12% now. Even if we were to increase the international budget 20 times to make a serious effort to go into space it would only be a small fraction of world GDP.

There will be those who argue that it would be better to spend our money solving the problems of this planet like climate change and pollution rather than wasting it on a possibly fruitless search for a new planet. I am not denying the importance of fighting climate change and global warming, but we can do that and still spare a quarter of a percent of world GDP for space. Isn’t our future worth a quarter of a percent?

We thought space was worth a big effort in the 60s. In 1962 President Kennedy committed the U.S. to landing a man on the Moon by the end of the decade. This was achieved on time by the Apollo 11 mission in 1969. The space race helped to create a fascination with science and led to great advances in technology, including the first large-scale integrated circuits which are the basis of all modern computers.

However, after the last Moon landing in 1972, with no future plans for further manned space flight, public interest in space declined. This went along with a general disenchantment with science in the West because although it had brought great benefits it had not solved the social problems that increasingly occupied public attention.

A new manned spaceflight program would do a lot to restore public enthusiasm for space and for science generally. Robotic missions are much cheaper and may provide more scientific information but they don’t catch the public imagination in the same way, and they don’t spread the human race into space, which I am arguing should be our long-term strategy.

A goal of a base on the Moon by 2020 and of a manned landing on Mars by 2025 would re-ignite the space program and give it a sense of purpose in the same way that President Kennedy’s Moon target did in the 1960s. A new interest in space would also increase the public standing of science generally. The low esteem in which science and scientists are held is having serious consequences. We live in a society that is increasingly governed by science and technology, yet fewer and fewer young people want to go into science. As a small step towards curing this, my daughter, Lucy, and I have written a children's book.

What will we find when we go into space? Is there alien life out there, or are we alone in the Universe? We believe that life arose spontaneously on the Earth, so it must be possible for life to appear on other suitable planets, of which there seem to be a large number in the galaxy.

But we don’t know how life first appeared. The probability of something as complicated as the DNA molecule being formed by random collisions of atoms in the primeval ocean is incredibly small. However, there might have been some simpler macromolecule which then built up the DNA or some other macromolecule capable of reproducing itself.

Still, even if the probability of life appearing on a suitable planet is very small, since the Universe is infinite, life would have appeared somewhere. If the probability is very low, the distance between two independent occurrences of life would be very large.

However, there is a possibility, known as panspermia, that life could spread from planet to planet, or from stellar system to stellar system, carried on meteors. We know that Earth has been hit by meteors that came from Mars, and others may have come from further afield. We have no evidence that any meteors carried life, but it remains a possibility. An important feature of life spread by panspermia is that it would have the same basis, which would be DNA for life in the neighborhood of the Earth. On the other hand, an independent occurrence of life would be extremely unlikely to be DNA based. So watch out if you meet an alien. You could be infected with a disease against which you have no resistance.

One piece of observational evidence on the probability of life appearing is that we have fossils of algae from 3.5 billion years ago. The Earth was formed 4.6 billion years ago and was probably too hot for about the first half billion years. So life appeared on Earth within half a billion years of it being possible, which is short compared to the 10 billion year lifetime of an Earth-like planet. This would suggest either panspermia or that the probability of life appearing independently is reasonably high. If it was very low, one would have expected it to take most of the 10 billion years available. If it is panspermia, any life in the solar system or in nearby stellar systems will also be DNA based.

While there may be primitive life in our region of the galaxy, there don’t seem to be any advanced intelligent beings. We don’t appear to have been visited by aliens. I am discounting reports of UFOs. Why would they appear only to cranks and weirdoes? If there is a government conspiracy to suppress the reports and keep for itself the scientific knowledge the aliens bring, it seems to have been a singularly ineffective policy so far. Furthermore, despite an extensive search by the SETI project, we haven’t heard any alien television quiz shows. This probably indicates that there are no alien civilizations at our stage of development within a radius of a few hundred light years. Issuing an insurance policy against abduction by aliens seems a pretty safe bet.


Why haven’t we heard from anyone out there? One view is expressed in this Calvin cartoon. The caption reads “Sometimes I think that the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the Universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.”



More seriously, there could be three possible explanations of why we haven’t heard from aliens. First, it may be that the probability of primitive life appearing on a suitable planet is very low. Second, the probability of primitive life appearing may be reasonably high, but the probability of that life developing intelligence like ours may be very low. Just because evolution led to intelligence in our case, we shouldn’t assume that intelligence is an inevitable consequence of Darwinian natural selection.
It is not clear that intelligence confers a long-term survival advantage. Bacteria and insects will survive quite happily even if our so-called intelligence leads us to destroy ourselves. This is the third possibility: Life appears and in some cases develops into intelligent beings, but when it reaches the stage of sending radio signals it will also have the technology to make nuclear bombs and other weapons of mass destruction. It would therefore be in danger of destroying itself before long. Let’s hope this is not the reason we have not heard from anyone.

Personally, I favor the second possibility, that primitive life is relatively common but that intelligent life is very rare. Some would say it has yet to occur on Earth.

Can we exist for a long time away from here? Our experience with the ISS, the International Space Station, shows that it is possible for human beings to survive for many months away from planet Earth. However, the zero gravity of orbit causes a number of undesirable physiological changes, a weakening of the bones, as well as creating practical problems with liquids, etc. One would therefore want any long-term base for human beings to be on a planet or moon. By digging into the surface, one would get thermal insulation and protection from meteors and cosmic rays. The planet or moon could also serve as a source of the raw materials that would be needed if the extraterrestrial community was to be self-sustaining, independently of Earth.

What are the possible sites of a human colony in the solar system? The most obvious is the Moon. It is close by and relatively easy to reach. We have already landed on it and driven across it in a buggy. On the other hand, the Moon is small and without atmosphere or a magnetic field to deflect the solar radiation particles like on Earth. There is no liquid water, but there may be ice in the craters at the north and south poles. A colony on the Moon could use this as a source of oxygen, with power provided by nuclear energy or solar panels. The Moon could be a base for travel to the rest of the solar system.

Mars is the obvious next target. It is half as far again as the Earth from the Sun, and so receives half of the warmth. It once had a magnetic field but it decayed 4 billion years ago, leaving Mars without protection from solar radiation. This stripped Mars of most of its atmosphere, leaving it with only one percent of the pressure of the Earth’s atmosphere. However, the pressure must have been higher in the past because we see what appear to be runoff channels and dried up lakes. Liquid water cannot exist on Mars now. It would vaporize in the near vacuum. This suggests that Mars had a warm wet period during which life might have appeared either spontaneously or through panspermia. There is no sign of life on Mars now, but if we found evidence that life had once existed that would indicate that the probability of life developing on a suitable planet was fairly high.

NASA has sent a large number of spacecraft to Mars, starting with Mariner 4 in 1964. It has surveyed the planet with a number of orbiters, the latest being the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. These orbiters have revealed deep gullies and the highest mountains in the solar system. NASA has also landed a number of probes on the surface of Mars, most recently the two Mars rovers, which have sent back pictures of the dry desert landscape. However, there is a large quantity of water in the form of ice in the polar regions. A colony on Mars could use this as a source of oxygen. There has been volcanic activity on Mars. This would have brought minerals and metals to the surface which a colony could use.

The Moon and Mars are the most suitable sites for space colonies in the solar system. Mercury and Venus are too hot, while Jupiter and Saturn are gas giants with no solid surface. The moons of Mars are very small and have no advantages over Mars itself. Some of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn might be possible, in particular Titan, a moon of Saturn that’s slightly more massive than our Moon and has a dense atmosphere. The Cassini-Huygens mission of NASA and ESA has landed a probe on Titan which has sent back pictures of the surface. However, it is very cold, being so far from the Sun, and I wouldn’t fancy living next to a lake of liquid methane.

What about beyond the solar system? Our observations indicate that a significant fraction of stars have planets around them. So far, we can detect only giant planets like Jupiter and Saturn but it is reasonable to assume that they will be accompanied by smaller, Earth-like planets. Some of these will lie in the “Goldilocks” zone where the distance from the star is in the right region for liquid water to exist on their surface.

There are around a thousand stars within 30 light years of Earth. If one percent of these have Earth-sized planets in the Goldilocks zone, we have 10 candidate new worlds. We can’t envisage visiting them with current technology, but we should make interstellar travel a long-term aim. By long-term, I mean over the next 200 to 500 years.

The human race has existed as a separate species for about 2 million years. Civilization began about 10,000 years ago, and the rate of development has been steadily increasing. If the human race is to continue for another million years, we will have to boldly go where no one has gone before.

Thank you for listening.

Stephen Hawking, the renowned British astrophysicist, speaks on "Why We Should Go Into Space" for NASA's 50th Anniversary lecture series at George Washington University, April 21, 2008. Hawking is disabled with ALS and speaks via a computer that is operated by eye and lip movement. Hawking advocates the colonization of the Moon and Mars.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

आंशुओं को अपनी आँखों से बहा कर देखो 


महबूबा की आँखों से निकलो,आंशुओं से भरे आँखों को देखो 
दर्द क्या होती है?आंशुओं को अपनी आँखों से बहा कर देखो.
घरों में जीने वाले लोगों, गलियों में भटकते लोगों को देखो 
दर्द क्या होती है? आंशुओं को अपनी आँखों से बहा कर देखो.


जिंदगी की परिभाषाओं की खोज में, जीवन बर्बाद करने वालों
घटाटोप अँधेरे में जीने के लिए लड़ने वालों को देखो.
दूसरों के किये पे इतराने वालों, गुणगान करने वालों
अपनी खून जला कर जीने वालों को देखो.

परियों के बाँहों में,परियों के ख्वाबों में रात बिताने वालों
भूखे पेट सड़क किनारे, चाँद को रोटी समझ तकने वालों को देखो.
छोटी-छोटी कठिनाईयों से जीवन हारने वालों
दुखों के पहाड से गुजरने वालों को देखो.
-अभय

Monday, August 23, 2010

Fundamentals of flight

You may post your Querries..by posting comments (As I explained "Fundamentals of Flight a basic introduction to aerodynamics " in the presentation Class on 23-08-2010.) I will be glad to solve your questions....

Thursday, March 18, 2010

How Times changes???
कल जब हम छोटे थे और कोई हमारी बात समझ नहीं पता था,तब सिर्फ एक हस्ती थी जो हमारे टूटे फूटे अल्फांज भी समझ जाती थी और आज हम उसी हस्ती को ये कहते हैं कि आप नहीं जानती, आप नहीं समझ पाएंगी, आप कि बातें मुझे समझ नहीं आती,... हो गयीं अब आप खुश!!!!!
Respect this Honourable personality before the Companionship ends।"It's tribute to our lovely Mother"
सख्त रास्तों में भी आसान सफ़र लगता है
ये मुझे "माँ" कि दुआओं का असर लगता है ,
एक मुद्दत से मेरी माँ नहीं सोई जब
मैंने एक बार कहा था
"माँ" मुझे डर लगता है ......
Hey friends let me know???what u guys think.

Monday, March 15, 2010

बचपन में तांका-झांकी.....

I want 2 go back 2 the time when "Innocence" was "Natural",When "Getting high" meant "On a swing",When "Drinking" Meant "Rasna Orange",When "Dad" was the only "Hero",When "Love" was "Mom's hug" when "Dad's shoulder" was "The highest place on earth",When ur "Worst enemies" were "ur siblings", when the only thing that could "Hurt" were "Bleeding knees", when the only things broken" were "Toys"& when "Goodbyes" only meant "Till tomorrow" Life has changed a lot and worst thing is those times will never come back ......Dedicated to Mahhhhhh frnds.

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

जरा ये कहानी तो पढो.......

This story was told to me by my friend Bhanu, which is in Chemical Engg. Department IIT,Bombay......Guys lets Read the story.

The headline is"Why Planning is important?"

One Night 4 college students were playing till late night and could not study for the test which was scheduled for the next day.
In the morning they thought of a plan. They made themselves look as dirty with grease and dirt. They then went up to the Dean and said that they had gone out to a wedding last night and on their return the tire of their car burst and they had to push the car all the way back and that they were in no condition to appear for the test.
So the Dean said they could have the re-test after 3 days. They thanked him and said they would be ready by that time.
On the third day they appeared before the Dean. The Dean said that as this was a Special Condition Test, all four were required to sit in separate classrooms for the test. They all agreed as they had prepared well in the last 3 days.

.

.

.
The Test consisted of 2 questions with a total of 100 Marks.

See Below for the question Paper:-















Q.1. Name of the car??
......... .......... ......... (2 MARKS)


Q.2. which tire burst? (98 MARKS)

a) Front Left b) Front Right
c) Back Left d) Back Right








As told by my friend Bhanu,It is a True story from IIT Bombay ...Batch 1992.

Saturday, March 6, 2010

The Earth's jolt(to make something move suddenly and roughly,SYN-jerk)that shortened A Day



how chile's quake could have shortened a day: BBC news

NASA calculates the quake in Chile shifted mass to such an extent that it changed the rotation of the earth to shorten a day by one millionth of a second. Using the same mathematical model, the NASA team estimated the 9.1 Sumatran earthquake in 2004 shortened a day by 6.8 microseconds.

it's been happening since the beginning of time, but NASA doesn't think should affect any biological systems. learn, in colloquial terms, how the quake caused a change in mass distribution at BBC news.

How an earthquake could shorten a day